Aspect Art | art history, info & news

Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni was an Italian Renaissance man best known for his art and sculpture. How he is best known often depends on whom you ask and their particular interests in the arts. Those enthralled by sculpture would immediately conjure images of his David, whereas those enticed by his painting would think of the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel or his Last Judgment.

Michelangelo was born in Caprese in 1475, the second son to a magistrate. As a young man he served as an apprentice in both painting and sculpture until he gained the attention of Lorenzo de Medici, whose school he thereafter attended and for whom he completed commissioned works of art such as Madonna of the Steps and Battle of the Centaurs. After a series of travels during which he was commissioned to sculpt Bacchus and Pieta, Michelangelo returned to Florence as the 15th century ended, his reputation having grown, and was commissioned to make what is now his most famous sculpture, David.

Having completed David by 1504, Michelangelo’s presence was requested in Rome by Pope Julius II, who commissioned him to design and build the Pope’s tomb. However, work on this project was intermittent at best, as Michelangelo’s attention was taken away from it regularly by other commissions. However, that is not to say that those other commissions were without merit. In fact, one of the first major commissions that interrupted his work on the papal tomb was to paint the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, which he painted as scenes from Genesis.

After completing the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel in 1512, Michelangelo spent his time working various commissions for Pope Leo X, who succeeded Julius II in 1513. During this time, Michelangelo worked primarily on the basicila of San Lorenzo, having been commissioned by Leo X to restore the façade and afterwards to add a Medici family tomb to the basilica. Neither project was ever finished however.

In 1534, Michelangelo was commissioned by Pope Clement VII to create a fresco of The Last Judgment on the altar wall of the Sistine Chapel. Although Clement VII died shortly after issuing the commission, his successor, Paul III, followed through with it and saw it completed in 1541. Afterwards, he began work on his two final works of fresco painting, The Conversion of St. Paul and The Marytrdom of St. Paul, both of which were finished by 1550. In 1546, Michelangelo worked on his final major commission of his life, one tapping his architectural skills, tasking him with designing the dome for St. Peter’s Basilica. He would complete his design and see it begun, but he would not survive to see the dome erected in full.

Michelangelo died in 1564, still working on St. Peter’s Basilica. He was a man of many skills in his time, not simply a painter, nor just a sculptor. He was both and more accomplished in both than most can ever hope to be in one. Beyond this, he was an architect as well, as shown in his designs for tombs and the dome of St. Peter’s Basilica. Michelangelo’s influence on art has been prolific to say the least; he has influenced generations of artists and will likely continue to for generations to come.

Title: Night Watch (Company of Frans Banning Cocq and Willem van Ruytenburch)
Artist: Rembrandt van Rijn (1606-69)
Medium: Oil on canvas
Dimensions: 363 x 437 cm
Location: Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam

Rembrandt Harmensz van Rijn was 36 years old in 1642 when he painted Night Watch, more properly known as Company of Frans Banning Cocq and Willem van Ruytenburch. The huge oil painting, currently 363 x 437 cm, but originally far larger, was commissioned by the militia members depicted in it. Only those who contributed to the fee were included in the portrait itself, with the exception of the drummer-boy who was not required to pay. The names of the men who contributed are written on a shield near the top of the painting. A few additional characters were added by Rembrandt for effect.

Militia paintings were popular at the time, but typically were fixed compositions: company men might be lined in a row with their weapons, or depicted seated at a banquet table. In a departure from tradition, Rembrandt painted this guard in action: not yet marching, but in preparatory disarray. Originally eighteen named men were represented in the painting and no two gazes are fixed on the same spot. The militia men are busy talking, pointing, bending, and reaching.

The captain and lieutenant, in the right foreground, appear to be already moving forward. These two are painted in brighter colors—the captain sports a red sash and the lieutenant wears yellow–and illuminated by light from above. Though they are the focal point of the painting, these men appear off-center to further suggest action and movement, since the viewer’s eye seeks to pull them toward the center—the direction they appear to be moving anyway.

Similarly lit from above is the symbolic figure of a girl. This angel-like figure carries symbols of these militiamen, the Arquebusiers, named for the long barreled gun they carried. She holds the militia’s goblet and wears a pistol and dead chicken at her waist. The claws of the chicken specifically represent the “Clauweniers,” this regiment. Additional symbols are scattered throughout the painting: a helmet is decorated with the motif of the Arquebusiers, the oak leaf, and the lieutenant’s coat bears three crosses like the Amsterdam coat of arms.

Although today only a few militiamen can be confidently identified by name from the list on the shield, Rembrandt did carefully paint the guards to be recognizable through accurate depiction of their form and features as well as through their weapons and dress. The lieutenant, for example, traditionally carries a partisan, a spear with an extremely long shaft that is still carried by lieutenants in Dutch militia regiments today. The sergeant in Night Watch holds a halberd– a shaft which holds spear, blade and pick.

Night Watch was originally larger than it is today. It was painted to be displayed in the Great Hall of the Arquebusiers Hall in Amsterdam, along with several other commissioned portraits. In 1715 it was moved to the city hall and was cut down substantially in order to fit the wall space available there. The painting was moved again in 1817 to the first Rijksmuseum. In 1885 the national art collection was moved to its present building which features the painting in a place of honor in the Night Watch Gallery.

Title: The Return of the Prodigal Son
Artist: Rembrandt van Rijn (1606-69)
Medium: Oil on canvas
Dimensions: 262 x 206 cm
Location: The Hermitage, St. Petersburg, Russia

The Return of the Prodigal Son is arguably Rembrandt Harmensz.van Rijn’s finest work; certainly it is the most famous from his late career. The painting depicts the Biblical story of the prodigal son from the book of Luke, Chapter 15. In the parable, the younger son of a wealthy father begs to be given his inheritance early. When his father gives it to him the young man leaves the family home and goes to a foreign country where he lives a life of dissipation, squanders his wealth, ruins his health, and finally is reduced to working as a swineherd. Eventually, the son sees the error in his ways and returns to his father, uncertain of his welcome, but humbling himself at the old man’s feet, and begging to be taken back into the family.

Significantly, the father forgives his son without hesitation and orders a fatted calf killed to celebrate his return. When the older son objects that his brother is to be rewarded for his faithless behavior, his father says:
“Son, thou art ever with me, and all that I have is thine. It was meet that we should make merry, and be glad: for this thy brother was dead, and is alive again; and was lost, and is found.”

Rembrandt has chosen to depict the family at the moment of the father’s forgiveness. In the father’s face we see of tender love and joy at the return of his son. The figures themselves, the frail, heavily-robed, old man bending over the kneeling figure of his tattered, balding, frail son, show Rembrandt’s great understanding of the human mind and spirit. The son’s face is not visible. In this primary pair, the emotion is all expressed in the father’s face and the eloquent lines of their figures.

In the background are several other figures: the brother stands directly behind the father; in the distant shadows is an upright woman in a hat. Beside the father and son are two other well dressed, men in dark hats, presumably visitors to the home. One squats beside the pair; another stands beside him, upright. Both serve as foils to emphasize the bent father, just as the upright figure of the brother contrasts with the penitent son.

Rembrandt’s use of light and shadow is masterful in this painting. The background shadows behind the primary figures hint at a large room and the well dressed woman barely visible lends mystery to the proceedings. Brightly lit against this darker background are the son’s golden garments and the ochre sleeves and scarlet shawl worn by the father.

The Return of the Prodigal Son was completed less than a year before Rembrandt’s death. It is now housed in St. Petersburg, Russia in The Hermitage.

Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn was a painter of great skill and created quite the collection to look back upon, but most people do not think of an artist for their work as a whole, but rather for those remarkable pieces of work that leave an imprint. Among some of Rembrandt’s more famed pieces of work are his Night Watch, Belshazzar’s Feast, Bathsheba at her Bath, Self Portrait (1658) and The Jewish Bride.

It is impossible to talk about Rembrandt’s art without bringing up his most famous painting: The Night Watch. It is ironic that his most famous painting is also misnamed, its original title being The Militia Company of Captain Frans Banning Cocq. However, it was unpopular during its time and after being rediscovered a century later was named as we know it due to the dimmed color of the picture, caused by weathering and poor condition. After its restoral it became evident that the image portrayed in The Night Watch was actually taking place in daylight.

Rembrandt made his claim to fame early in his life painting large, dramatic religious and mythological scenes in the Baroque style. Accordingly, works like Belshazzar’s Feast, which takes its subject matter from the Bible, is pointedly dynamic and rich in color. Paintings like Belshazzar’s Feast remain known as examples of a period of time in his life where he was inspired and influenced by Baroque artists such as Peter Paul Rubens.

Among his famed paintings preserved at the Louvre in Paris is Bathsheba at her Bath, yet another of his paintings that takes its material from the Bible. It is a calmer painting than much of his prior work, moving away from the Baroque technique and making something more contemplative and tragic. It is considered Rembrandt’s finest example of nude painting and was also his last.

Another of Rembrandt’s most famous works was his Self-Portrait from 1658. He did many self-portraits, but this one in particular evidenced his style and talent in the later era of his life, when he was drawing a great deal of inspiration from the works of Titian, the Italian Renaissance painter. This inspiration led to his works being larger and broader in brushstroke, with calmer imagery in the many self-portraits he compiled in his last twenty years of life.

The Jewish Bride is another of his more famed works, perhaps not so much because of the composition, but because of the controversy regarding who is pictured. Popular theory ranges from Biblical figures such as Isaac and Rebekah from the Book of Genesis to other couples from the Old Testament such as Abraham and Sarah. Some also believe that the couple pictured could be Rembrandt’s son Titus and his wife. It should also be noted that The Jewish Bride was painted in the twilight of Rembrandt’s life and may have reflected a spiritual exploration of love or religion.

Given the breadth of work to examine and the varying talent of the artist, it is never a simple matter to say what the most famous work of an artist may be, as many works exemplify different aspects of his life and career. These are but a few of his most celebrated and well known paintings, revered today as works of a true master.

Born July 15, 1606, in Leiden, The Netherlands, Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn is considered one of the greatest artists in European art history, and a major contributor to the Golden Age of Dutch Art. He was the ninth child in a well-to-do family, he attended Latin school as a boy, and then the University of Leiden, where he showed an inclination toward painting. He was apprenticed to several artists, most notably Pieter Lastman, before opening his own studio with several friends before he was twenty. In 1627, Rembrandt was already teaching his own students.

Rembrandt was ‘discovered’ by Constantijn Huygens, who began to commission important works for display in the palace at The Hague. This led to Rembrandt producing works for Prince Frederik Hendrik for many years.

In 1931, Rembrandt moved to the newly burgeoning Amsterdam, where he began to work professionally as a portrait painter. Upon his arrival in Amsterdam, Rembrandt stayed with an art dealer, Hendrick van Uylenburg. Within three years Rembrandt had married Hendrick’s cousin, Saskia van Uylenburg. By that time, Rembrandt had become a burgess of Amsterdam, a position like a town representative, and was a member of the local painter’s guild. He also continued to take on more students, and his fame as a painter began to grow.

Rembrandt and Saskia moved out on their own in 1635, and then moved into a prominent house on Jodenbreestraat, which is now the Rembrandt House Museum. The mortgage on the house on Jodenbreestraat would later contribute to Rembrandt’s financial difficulties. The neighborhood was becoming the Jewish Quarter of Amsterdam, and it was here that Rembrandt sought out his largely Jewish neighbors as models in his ongoing series of works drawn from the Old Testament of the Bible. Rembrandt’s Biblical works utilize both his talent and his great knowledge of scripture to portray key moments in both the Old and New Testaments.

Rembrandt’s financial troubles may have grown out of his personal woes. He and Saskia lost their first three children, and with the birth of their son Titus in 1641, Saskia grew ill and never recovered. She died, probably from tuberculosis, in 1642. Rembrandt’s paintings of her while sick and on her deathbed are among his most powerful and moving.

During his wife’s illness, Rembrandt engaged a maid and caretaker for his son, Geertje Dircx. Later, she would sue him for breach of promise, for which she was awarded alimony, implying a relationship. Rembrandt paid the ordered alimony, but continued to try to have Geertje committed to an asylum.

Toward the end of the 1640s, Rembrandt started an affair with Hendrickje Stoffels. In 1654, Stoffels gave birth to Rembrandt’s daughter, Cornelia, which incurred the wrath of the Reformation Church, which excommunicated Stoffels, but ignored Rembrandt, as he was not a member of the church. Rembrandt and his mistress were considered married under common law, but were never actually married.

Eventually, his overspending caught up with him, and Rembrandt was forced to sell off his large collection of art and curios, and move to a smaller house. The painter’s guild in Amsterdam tried to cripple him financially by banning him from making a living as a painter because of his situation. To get around this ruling, Rembrandt’s son and mistress set up shop as art dealers, with him as their employee.

In his own words, Rembrandt’s goal as an artist was to achieve “the greatest and most natural movement (or natural emotion, depending on the translation).” Over his career he is credited with more than 300 paintings, thousands of drawings, and hundreds more etchings or prints. Some of his most impacting works include his ongoing series of self-portraits, which traces his visage from lively youth to successful adult to troubled old man. While he was greatly appreciated as a genius in his own day, this did not prevent Rembrandt from falling on hard times, outliving his mistress and his only son, and being buried in an unmarked grave in 1669.

Listed below are the articles that we have written on some of Da Vinci’s paintings.

As with all our articles, they are 100% unique, with information and images from all the very latest findings, discoveries and theories.

The Mona Lisa

• The Mona Lisa by Leonardo Da Vinci
• Analysis of the Mona Lisa
• Features of the Mona Lisa
• Mona Lisa – Simple Commission, Self Portrait, or Greater Mystery? (long article)
• Looking at a Picture of the Mona Lisa
• The Official Stamp on the Mona Lisa
• Why is the Mona Lisa So Famous?
• Was Mona Lisa a Real Person?
• Where Can I find A Picture Of Mona Lisa?
• Who Painted the Mona Lisa : A Short Mona Lisa History
• Mona Lisa Smile Historical Review
• What has Mona Lisa Got to Smile About?
• Speed Painting the Mona Lisa (video)

The Last Supper

• History of Da Vinci’s The Last Supper Painting
• The Basis for Da Vinci’s Last Supper
• Impact of Da Vinci’s The Last Supper
• Da Vinci’s The Last Supper Conspiracy Theories
• The Last Supper Alternative Versions

Leonardo Da Vinci & His Other Paintings

• Da Vinci’s Early Paintings (1470-1490)
• Da Vinci’s Later Paintings (1490-1516)
• Leonardo DaVinci’s Drawings
• Motivation behind Leonardo Da Vinci’s Paintings
• Leonardo Da Vinci’s Artistic Technique
• The Paintings Featured in Dan Brown’s “The Da Vinci Code” Book
• Vitruvian Man : Symbol of Art and Science
• The Real Da Vinci Code

With painting as his art form, Leonardo Da Vinci proved to be one of the greatest artists who ever lived. The techniques he created in those years are considered to have been revolutionary to the world of art and today are studied as founding pillars of the Renaissance and movements that followed.

His palette in particular is incredibly famous for its ability to have been so revolutionary with so many aspects of art. In the Mona Lisa alone, Da Vinci was able to create numerous new methods of painting. For a man whose painting career was not nearly as prolific as some of his contemporaries, the impact he had on artistic expression is absolutely unmatched.

The first step in Leonardo’s paintings was to craft an underpainting composed entirely of basic browns and grays. This can be seen in his unfinished painting of St. Jerome, showing only those neutral colors with no form, lighting or shading. The addition of color does not come until much later when Leonardo would apply glazes of a transparent substance over the top of that underpainting. Because of that transparency, the upper glazes show bits of the underpainting, providing a guide of sorts for Leonardo’s painting.

What Was the Style of Leonardo Da Vinci?

His palettes were almost always very realistic, taken from the muted tones of the everyday veranda or river valley. On a typical palette for Leonardo Da Vinci sat browns, greens and blues all within the same basic range, so as to create the unity that his paintings have been so lauded for. He refrained from the brilliant yellows and reds of his predecessors and grabbed attention not with his colors, but with his technique.

It was in the lighting that almost all of Leonardo Da Vinci’s brilliance shone. His facial features were crafted through very carefully constructed blending and the carrying of colors between features. For this reason, in paintings such as the Mona Lisa, the lighting becomes darker and less colorful the further away from her face you are. Such a subtle technique draws absolute attention to the face and features of the sitter.

Another technique Leonardo Da Vinci developed in his Mona Lisa was that of sfumato. Sfumato, derived from the Italian word for smoke was Leonardo Da Vinci’s technique for softening and blending edges with a series of dark glazes. Rather than simply mixing the colors on his palette, Leonardo continually applied differing tones in glaze to create a certain depth that would never have been possible otherwise. This application of multiple transparencies created new colors that would be impossible through the simple mixing of paint.

In Leonardo Da Vinci’s perspective drawings, his various methods of geometrical progression and careful construction can be found. For Leonardo Da Vinci, perspective in art was one of the most important aspects. He developed the newly minted single point perspective in his Mona Lisa and was always careful to craft the most detailed of proportions, utilizing nearly perfect ratios in his work. His Vitruvian Man shows a meticulous care for the importance of perspective art.

Leonardo Da Vinci used numerous other tonal and glazing effects in his painting, many of which have been recognized as the first time in modern art. He did not simply paint as painting was done at that time. He recognized what he needed and wanted in an image and if a technique did not exist to create it, he invented a new technique. To recreate a similar palette and effect to that of Leonardo Da Vinci, a selection of earthy and transparent colors are ideal. It’s even possible to find predefined selections of “Da Vinci” like tones.

To say Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519) was a genius is falling short of the praise he deserves. He was an artist, engineer, architect, mathematician, anatomist, musician, and inventor. He was able to change the world as we know it with his inventions such as the machine gun, the parachute, and the calculator. But despite his genius in so many areas of science and engineering, da Vinci is most well known for his paintings.

He kept his private life very secret, which is something many famous people attempt to do. However, da Vinci’s sexuality has been questioned and still is so he may have had to keep his life secret out of necessity, for the sake of his life and his career. Despite this, we see much evidence of his possible homosexuality in his paintings.

The paintings of da Vinci frequently depict both the male and female anatomy, although the female anatomy is often… However, there is much evidence to support his gay lifestyle, in his apprenticeships and his art. His most notable apprenticeship was with a young man, Gian Giacomo Caprotti da Oreno, whom he called Salai, which meant little Devil or unclean one. This youth was more trouble than he was worth, although a beautiful youth, and he stayed apprenticed to da Vinci for 30 years. Salai was the subject of at least two of da Vinci’s erotic homosexual paintings including one that was on the verso of a foglio and showed Salai’s behind being approached by many penises walking on two legs.

There were presumably many homo-erotic paintings including paintings depicting homosexual intercourse that were destroyed by a priest who found them after da Vinci’s death. The fact that homosexuality was prominent in much of his work, that he was accused of sodomy with a youth that was known for such acts, and that his “apprentice” of 30 years really did not make a name for himself as an artist leads one to believe that the allegations that da Vinci was gay are well-founded. After all, it is no secret that artists portray what they know in their work and that their work is a part of who they are. It also makes sense considering the fact that if da Vinci was not gay, why would he bring about the speculation that he was through his work at a time in which that type of lifestyle could have brought death.

Of course, the church did not approve of homosexuality, but somehow, da Vinci’s life remained somewhat of a mystery. It may well be that he was so influential that he could “get away” with it. He is certainly honored by today’s gay community as being a “gay hero”. Whether he was indeed gay or not is, at this point, still speculated despite the evidence in favor of this. It is known that da Vinci generally kept company with men and did not approve of the concept of heterosexual relations leading to procreation. He never sired any children and he left his estate to his two apprentices, Francesco Melzi and Salai. Gay or not? You decide.

Leonardo diVinci’s drawing of man in ideal form, the Vitruvian man, was first sketched in 1492 or so in one of his numerous journals. The image, a sketch of a nude male stretched into two separate poses within the space of a square and a circle, is one of his most famous works. Occasionally called the Canon of Proportions or Proportions of Man, the image has long been held as an important symbol for the proportions of man.

With the Vitruvian Man’s proportions, Leonardo da Vinci was able to blend both art and science, by very definition the goal of the Renaissance masters. Leonardo himself had a great deal of interest in human anatomy and the concept of proportion. One of Leonardo’s lasting mindsets and overall legacies for the age was the idea that the human body was a symbolic representation of the greater universe itself.

Furthermore, the circle and square surrounding the male body in the drawing have been described as symbols themselves. Many believe that the square surrounding the body is a symbol of the material existence of man while the circle represents the spiritual existence. His goal through this drawing then was to create a direct correlation between the material and spiritual aspects of humanity.

His own writing in the notebook, written in his famous mirrored writing, described his sketch as a study of the proportions of the human body, in this case male. He utilized the words of the Roman architect Vitruvius to create his proportions for the ideal male body, which included:

• The Palm is the width of four fingers
• The Foot is the width of four palms
• The Cubit is the width of six palms
• A Man is four cubits tall
• Four cubits equals one pace
• The measurement of a man’s outspread arms is the same as his height.
• The hairline to the chin is equal to one-tenth of a man’s height
• The top of the head to the chin is one-eighth of a man’s height.
• Shoulder width shall be no more than one quarter of a man’s height

Leonardo’s own drawing combines both the descriptions of Vitruvius and his own observations to create a set careful crafted proportions with what many people have interpreted as symbols. The overall effect is to create a direct correlation between human symmetry and the universe. The positioning of the limbs in the drawing makes it possible to create upward of 16 different poses and the proportions remain the same.

The outer circle has been described as a full range of motion, though it does depart slightly from Vitruvius’ original writings by lowering the arms slightly. The secondary drawing shows a much less extended body but keeps the very same proportions in line with the rest of the drawing.

Over the course of the centuries, Da Vincci’s Vitruvian man has come to symbolize everything about Leonardo DaVinci’s calculated approach to both art and science and the beauty of the human form. Artists and scientists alike study high resolution Vitruvian Man copies as a means to recreate their own images and better understand those relationships.

The Da Vinci Code plays on many of the theories and mysteries that have long followed Leonardo Da Vinci and his eccentric methods around for the last 500 years. Despite the Last Supper and the Mona Lisa, the book and film utilized numerous other paintings to make points about Da Vinci’s ties to the Priory of Scion. Many of those images, some of Da Vinci’s most enduring and famous legacies, have been around for years.

Madonna of the Rocks 1483

As the painting in the Louvre behind which is hidden the key Langdon finds before escaping the police, the Madonna of the Rocks is yet another incredible famous Da Vinci image. Da Vinci painted two versions of his famous first commission. The first of these two versions is that of the 1483 Madonna of the Rocks. Originally commissioned by the Confraternity of the Immaculate Conception, the painting was to be an altar piece but was not completed at the time required of the contract with Da Vinci. For that reason, it was left unfinished for the better part of two years. However, because of its popularity, the painting was eventually painted again for another church’s same altar piece, that being the version that remains today in the London Gallery. In the Da Vinci code, it is remarked that this version of the painting was considered heretical by the church with Jesus kneeling to John and numerous symbols of femininity and masculinity littered throughout the rocky landscape.

Madonna of the Rocks 1508

The second version of Da Vinci’s famous image of Jesus and John meeting on the trip to Egypt is located today in the London Gallery and was painted over 20 years after the original. The painting is believed to have been the result of the excessive popularity of the first, thus commissioned as a copy. Leonardo is not believed to have painted the entire work alone, though his contributions are noted by the shading and characteristic tones of his painting. In the Da Vinci Code, the London copy of the Madonna of the Rocks was supposedly the second version created by Da Vinci to mollify the enraged Church after his heretical first painting.

Adoration of the Magi

As one of Da Vinci’s original commissions, The Adoration of the Magi was never quite finished. Today it sits in the Uffizi Gallery in Florence. The painting itself depicts the traditional image of the wisest of men in the land bowing before the infant Christ. Thought the image was never completed, much has been made of the symbolism found in it by novels such as the Da Vinci Code. Located in back, beside the Tree are two figures that Brown denotes as Jesus and Mary Magdalene. Behind them is a Knight Templar and the careful constructed “V” shape in an onlooker’s hand is meant to represent femininity. The painting itself was left unfinished as Da Vinci left for Milan before he was able to get beyond the preliminary sketching stage of the commission.

Vitruvian Man

The Vitruvian Man is a simple drawing found in Leonardo’s notebooks that has become one of his most enduring works, a symbol of art and science in unison and the perfect geometry and proportions that so intrigued him. The work depicts two poses of a man stretched out within a square and a circle, designed to show the perfect proportions of the male body as described by the Ancient Roman, Vitruvius and revised by Leonardo himself. In the Da Vinci Code, the French Curator of the Louvre is found dead in this pose, utilizing the geometry of the original to leave a message for Langdon and his granddaughter.